DEFAMING THE HITCH


LABOUR councillors are blocking plans to honour campaigning journalist Christopher Hitchens with a statue, with one of them branding the late writer as a “pro-war Islamophobe”.


http://www.camdennewjournal.com/news/2012/oct/labour-politician-threatens-quit-if-bust-%E2%80%98pro-war%E2%80%99-journalist-christopher-hitchens-goe
An Open Letter to Councillor Awale Olad 

I read your exchange of E-mails with the British Humanist Society in the Camden New Journal, I quote;

“I don’t mean to speak ill of the dead but I would resign before I’d ever support the bust of a pro-war Islamophobe,” he wrote.

Now I do not know how familiar you are with the work of Christopher Hitchens, but the remarks above suggest very little familiarity, indeed these remarks suggest ignorance of his writings. Christopher always used to say that as soon as the opponent in a debate slips into, as you obviously so easily do, the ad hominem, the argument is as good as won. Vulgar abuse and misrepresentation are not argument. It now seems to be standard form to accuse anyone who attacks the teaching of Islam as an ‘Islamaphobe[1],’ this is supposed to serve two purposes, one to shut down all argument and  two place the accuser on the high moral ground. It is in fact the waving of the flag of defeat, though often backed up by the threat of physical violence. Ever since the Rushdie affair we have had to get used to dialogue along the lines of ‘respect our religion or take the consequences.’ This is the language of The Mob, though also of course the language of the three great monotheisms across the centuries. Christianity has lost both the power and the ‘moral’ will to execute heretics and apostates, only Islam continues to practise these charming rites.
Christopher took on all these practices far more articulately than I ever could and debated the believers in Christianity, Judaism and Islam in open debate, though only practitioners of the latter religion sent him death threats.
As to Christopher’s stance on the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, his position throughout was a moral one. Unlike the majority of the ‘anti war’ crowd he knew something of the reality of Saddam’s regime, and he stood in solidarity with the people of Iraq in general and the people of Kurdistan in particular. He also took the quaint few, once common on the left, that principles of equality between the sexes, free speech and human rights were universal. He also held the curious notion that young girls should be allowed to go to school without the threat of being murdered or having acid thrown in their faces. He thought these things worth fighting for and I for one find my self in agreement with him. War monger is the cheapest and nastiest of defamations, were those who fought against fascism war mongers?
As to speaking ill of the dead Christopher would not care, though he might say, could you please dispense with the pious throat clearing.  He would, I suspect like to be remembered in Red Lion Square, scene of so much historic oratory from the once great left in this country, including past giants of the Labour Party. However these decisions are now left in the hands of little men, some might say puffed up pygmies, who tread in the ashes of a once great tradition of liberty, free speech and the celebration of human values.
If by chance this monument should be erected do resign by all means, I think you will find, to your astonishment, that Camden continues to function without you.

Please note I will be placing this correspondence as an open letter  on my blog  http://alextalbot.blogspot.co.uk/ and you do, of course, have the right of reply.



[1] A phobia is defined as follows, ‘A persistent, abnormal, and irrational fear of a specific thing or situation that compels one to avoid it, despite the awareness and reassurance that it is not dangerous’ (OED). Whatever Christopher’s objections to Islam, and indeed to all religions, they were far from irrational. As to whether the teachings of Islam are dangerous or not that surely belongs in the realm of public debate. Though I know from experience that as soon as you attempt to engage in such a debate you are accused of being an Islamaphobe; curiously circular this process don’t you  think? 


Having visited this page I would be grateful for your feedback, either tick one of the boxes below or make a comment via the comments button.

Popular posts from this blog

NESRINE MALIK AND THE UNSUNG VIRTUES OF HYPOCRISY

Image
As I write this a 27 year old woman, Mariam Ibrahim, has just had a baby in a Sudanese prison, ‘the condition of the mother and baby is not known as Ibrahim's lawyer and her husband, a US citizen, had been denied access to her. Omdurman women's prison has a basic clinic, where the child is thought to have been born. Ibrahim has been shackled since being imprisoned.’ [1]   Mariam also has an 18 month old child who is also being held in prison with her. The ‘crime’ for which she is imprisoned is apostasy, for which she has received the death sentence. She has also been sentenced to 100 lashes, for the additional crime of having sex with her Christian husband. Although she has been a lifelong Christian her father was a Muslim, Sudanese sharia law forbids women to marry outside the Muslim faith, men needless to say can do as they please in these matters. Mariam Ibrahim and her husband.  Nineteen countries punish their citizens for apostasy, and in 12 of those countries...
Read more

INTERVIEW WITH TOM VAGUE

Image
Tom Vague At the top end of All Saints Road there is a refuge, an enclave in which a local Bohemian culture retains a foothold, this is the Book & kitchen , a café/bookshop with adjoining terrace. Here the bustle of the nearby market gives way to conversation, conversation in the presence of images of the recent, and not so recent, past. The past of an area that has contributed so much to the life and culture of the city. I was there to meet local historian Mr Tom Vague a man intimately familiar with so much of this history. What Tom doesn’t know about the recent history of the area probably is not worth knowing. With Tom’s energy and effort Colville Community Forum, supported by City Living Local Life, recently held a gathering at The Book and Kitchen to celebrate this rich history. February 16 6-9 Pm, with Film Screening and Readings Exhibition February 16-26 2016. Featuring 30 Classic Westway Photographs and Posters. This represents one of a number of initiatives of t...
Read more

VOLINE AND TROTSKY

Волин и Троцкого A Footnote in Russian History In April 1917 the Russian anarchist revolutionary Voline* and Leon Trotsky were both stranded in New York as the Russian revolution broke out in Petrograd , inevitably coming into contact with one another. Voline stated that he felt that the Bolsheviks, given their ruthlessness and single minded determination, would ultimately come to power. They would then begin eliminating their opponents, amongst whom of course were the anarchists; this persecution would end with the Bolsheviks shooting the anarchists “like partridges.” Trotsky was dismissive, they might have their differences but they were comrades in arms, they had different interpretations of the revolutionary process but shared the same goals. It was nonsense to speak of Bolsheviks shooting revolutionary comrades, “we are socialists, comrade Voline! So we are not your enemies….” [1] In December of 1919, whilst gravely wounded Voline was captured by the Bolshe...
Read more