FAMILY MATTERS: Britain And the Tabloid Press

I am currently taking a short break in Shropshire, which is basking in July Sunshine and the murmur of summer content.
London is not England and many a foreign traveler has made the mistake of imagining it to be so. Here in the local papers one gets the feel of the reality of most people’s lives, for the local press, unlike the national, is actually filled with news. True it is not the news of war and revolution, but of by-pass proposals, petty crime and fires in which nobody is hurt; consequently it feels closer to reality than the national press.
Though here I now, the first time in a while, I have regular access to The Daily Mirror. The Mirror historically stood apart from the rest of the tabloids, being of the left. During the 1960’s it enjoyed a reputation for radicalism. Now, befitting a paper recently edited by that self promoting fraud Piers Morgan, it resembles all the other tabloids and adopts the same tone.

The tone of the tabloid press in this country is a curious mix of baby talk, squalid insinuation and the intimate language of a national 'family.'  In pages containing little but gossip, that assumes a common currency; that, for example, you know in the past who has been cheating on who, and the implications of reconciliation. Loud in the fullest sense of the word, a cacophony of the blathering of nonentities, wannabees and soap star actors, the tabloids are the spiritual home of the cult of ‘celebrity.’ Celebrity you understand being nothing to do with achievement or virtue but consisting solely of the quality of being ‘famous.’ What you are famous for is purely a secondary matter; fame, an end in itself, can be attained for being boorish or stupid, for being vain and opinionated, sexually promiscuous, fat, ugly, beautiful, violent, glamorous or venal.
The platform on which these ‘qualities,’ are brought to the attention of the national family is the television; once television exposes some, preferably grotesque, variant of the human condition the tabloids take up the story. Soon the whole family is gossiping about some loudmouth, precocious child or semi literate television soap star.
Increasingly though this pattern is being reversed, as TV apes the tabloid tone. Breakfast shows on the commercial networks were the first to adopt this style, now even the BBC morning news no longer differentiates between real and manufactured news. Journalists, always a man and a woman, the woman personable and pretty, sit flirting with one another on a sofa; invited into our homes, they are now part of the great extended family. We ‘know’ them and they ‘know’ us. The language is intimate and knowing. We are, to coin a phrase, all in this together.

Does any of this matter? Well, a world in which the traumas of an Anglina Jolie, Katie Price or Jennifer Anniston feel as immediate and pressing as your own concerns; where you feel on intimate terms with a soap star whilst your neighbors are strangers to you, does not suggest good mental health. It is also a world created and packaged by the likes Piers Morgan’s, Paul Dacre  and Kelvin McKenzie. It is their values that we imbibe and the interests of the like of Rupert Murdoch that are served.
However it is argued back, with some truth, that they are only giving the people what they want, triviality, frivolity and babble. It is true that the landscape of reality can at times be hard on the eye, the existential hum too loud. We can all settle for the comfort of the familiar, all crave diversion, entertainment, the razzmatazz of the circus. We can all seek to keep reality at bay, lest ‘human voices wake us and we drown.’



Having visited this page I would be grateful for your feedback, either tick one of the boxes below or make a comment via the comments button.

Popular posts from this blog

NESRINE MALIK AND THE UNSUNG VIRTUES OF HYPOCRISY

Image
As I write this a 27 year old woman, Mariam Ibrahim, has just had a baby in a Sudanese prison, ‘the condition of the mother and baby is not known as Ibrahim's lawyer and her husband, a US citizen, had been denied access to her. Omdurman women's prison has a basic clinic, where the child is thought to have been born. Ibrahim has been shackled since being imprisoned.’ [1]   Mariam also has an 18 month old child who is also being held in prison with her. The ‘crime’ for which she is imprisoned is apostasy, for which she has received the death sentence. She has also been sentenced to 100 lashes, for the additional crime of having sex with her Christian husband. Although she has been a lifelong Christian her father was a Muslim, Sudanese sharia law forbids women to marry outside the Muslim faith, men needless to say can do as they please in these matters. Mariam Ibrahim and her husband.  Nineteen countries punish their citizens for apostasy, and in 12 of those countries...
Read more

INTERVIEW WITH TOM VAGUE

Image
Tom Vague At the top end of All Saints Road there is a refuge, an enclave in which a local Bohemian culture retains a foothold, this is the Book & kitchen , a café/bookshop with adjoining terrace. Here the bustle of the nearby market gives way to conversation, conversation in the presence of images of the recent, and not so recent, past. The past of an area that has contributed so much to the life and culture of the city. I was there to meet local historian Mr Tom Vague a man intimately familiar with so much of this history. What Tom doesn’t know about the recent history of the area probably is not worth knowing. With Tom’s energy and effort Colville Community Forum, supported by City Living Local Life, recently held a gathering at The Book and Kitchen to celebrate this rich history. February 16 6-9 Pm, with Film Screening and Readings Exhibition February 16-26 2016. Featuring 30 Classic Westway Photographs and Posters. This represents one of a number of initiatives of t...
Read more

VOLINE AND TROTSKY

Волин и Троцкого A Footnote in Russian History In April 1917 the Russian anarchist revolutionary Voline* and Leon Trotsky were both stranded in New York as the Russian revolution broke out in Petrograd , inevitably coming into contact with one another. Voline stated that he felt that the Bolsheviks, given their ruthlessness and single minded determination, would ultimately come to power. They would then begin eliminating their opponents, amongst whom of course were the anarchists; this persecution would end with the Bolsheviks shooting the anarchists “like partridges.” Trotsky was dismissive, they might have their differences but they were comrades in arms, they had different interpretations of the revolutionary process but shared the same goals. It was nonsense to speak of Bolsheviks shooting revolutionary comrades, “we are socialists, comrade Voline! So we are not your enemies….” [1] In December of 1919, whilst gravely wounded Voline was captured by the Bolshe...
Read more