THE GREAT PSYCHOLOGY EXPERIMENT WITH BENEFIT CLAIMANTS
The Stanford prison experiment is one of the most famous experiments in psychology.
‘Twenty-four male
students out of seventy-five were selected to take on randomly assigned roles
of prisoners and guards in a mock prison situated in the basement of the Stanford
psychology building. The participants adapted to their roles well beyond
Zimbardo's expectations, as the guards enforced authoritarian measures and
ultimately subjected some of the prisoners to psychological torture. Many of
the prisoners passively accepted psychological abuse and, at the request of the
guards, readily harassed other prisoners who attempted to prevent it. The
experiment even affected Zimbardo himself, who, in his role as the
superintendent, permitted the abuse to continue. Two of the prisoners quit the
experiment early and the entire experiment was abruptly stopped after only six
days. Certain portions of the experiment were filmed and excerpts of footage
are publicly available.’[1]
I thought of the Stanford prison experiment the other day
when listening to the House of Commons debate on benefit sanctions, of which I
spoke in my last post :-http://alextalbot.blogspot.co.uk/2014/04/the-rules.html
As MP after MP recounted irrational, cruel and sometimes downright
inhuman actions by Jobcentre Plus staff it was increasingly clear that the abuse
of claimants has become systemic. Undoubtedly a solid reason for this has been
direction from above, the sanctions were made much harsher in 2012, and despite
repeated denials from the government it is clear that a target culture exists.
That said the
irrationality and cruelty demonstrated by some of the examples that MP’s gave
hinted at something more sinister and I began to wonder if something along the
lines of the Stanford experiment was in fact taking place. The mind-set of those
some of those operating the system was most starkly revealed by a recruitment agent
Kelly-Jane Stone who openly boasted on Twitter of the satisfaction she felt
when her actions led to someone having their benefits stopped.[2]
If the ghastly and dispiriting history of the 20th
Century taught us anything it sadly taught us that given arbitrary power over
others people will abuse it. As Zimbardo,
who carried out the Stanford experiment observed; “Only a few people were able to
resist the situational temptations to yield to power and dominance while
maintaining some semblance of morality and decency; obviously I was not among
that noble class.” Taken from his book The Lucifer Effect Philip Zimbardo.
The cultural climate created toward benefit claimants by
government ministers and newspaper campaigns by the Daily Mail, The Sun, and
the Daily express have surely also greatly contributed to a state of affairs in
which treating benefit claimants with arbitrary cruelty has become acceptable.[3]
The Stanford experiment highlighted something that anyone
who has ever lived in a totalitarian society has long known, give people arbitrary
power they will begin to behave in ways they would not normally act in their
everyday lives or in other situations.
The increase in the use of food banks directly correlates with the new harsher sanctions regime. |
The Stanford experiment was called off after six days
because of the inhumanity that was beginning to surface. We are now entering
the third year of the new harsher sanctions regime. How long will people
continue to sit back as some of the most vulnerable in society live in a state of affairs in which their
ability to house, clothe and feed themselves are subject to the arbitrary whims
of the guards who hold the key to their benefits?
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanford_prison_experiment
[2] http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/job-agent-boasted-on-twitter-about-halting-suckers-benefits-8758207.html
[3]
Although extreme, the case of Mark Wood an extremely vulnerable man with mental
health problems who starved to death after having his benefits cut is not
unfortunately an isolated case. http://www.theguardian.com/society/2014/feb/28/man-starved-to-death-after-benefits-cut.
The fact that so little outrage has been expressed by this case speaks volumes.
Having visited this page I would be grateful for your feedback, either tick one of the boxes below or make a comment via the comments button.