RUDE AWAKENING

If you are a supporter of Jeremy Corbyn and have not stopped celebrating since Saturday morning read on at your own peril, you will not like what I have to say. If this does not describe you, these are my first thoughts on his election as Labour Leader.
 

The good news first, at least for those, like me, kept awake by apocalyptic visions of the death of the Labour Party, we’ve been here before. From 1932 to 1935 the Labour Party was led by anti-war pacifist George Lansbury, he was ousted by the Trade Union movement who in those days took opposing fascism seriously. Lansbury later took to meeting Hitler and supported the Munich agreement. Lansbury was an idealist, who believed that you could negotiate with fascists and Nazi’s, -indeed he met Hitler and Mussolini, later providing naïve descriptions of these encounters.
Lansbury in 1936


"I would close every recruiting station, disband the Army and disarm the Air Force. I would abolish the whole dreadful equipment of war and say to the world: "Do your worst"

- George Lansbury, leader of the Labour Party, message to the voters in the Fulham East by-election, June 1933.
 (I don’t think even Corbyn has gone that far, though I await the trawl through his past quotes, - from the perspective of the right Corbyn and chums are the gift that keeps on giving).

Lansbury had an honourable career in the Labour Party, amongst other things championing woman’s suffrage, being imprisoned twice for his beliefs. So any comparison with Lansbury would flatter Corbyn. I make no such comparison, other than the fact that Lansbury’s views also rendered the Labour Party unelectable.

So the bad news is that as things stand the Labour Party is now unelectable. I perhaps should say that the core of Corbyn’s domestic agenda makes sense and his critique of the fallacy of austerity correct;  and there may be an earthquake, the political culture of the country may alter beyond recognition in the next 53 months. There might be a mass revolt against the Tories, now feeling themselves unrestrained, whose programme of austerity might stretch the fabric of political consent to breaking point, creating the possibility of a Labour Breakthrough. I would like to think so, though this would not alter my view of a Corbyn premiership.
 For like Lansbury Corbyn is a natural appeaser. Though unlike Lansbury his dislike of violence is somewhat selective. The kind of violence he dislikes is any involving NATO, Britain or the US, whether humanitarian or in defence of western interests. The violence of Hamas, Hezbollah, Putin or the Iranian Revolutionary guards he understands.
Corbyn openly espouses leaving NATO and is ambivalent about the EU, he would negotiate/appease Islamists and Putin. He would make the world a less safe place for liberalism and social democracy. For these reasons Corbyn must be opposed.
The fact that the Tories, using the economic collapse of 2008 as cover for a cynical ideological driven move to shrink the state, see Corbyn’s election creating the possibility to move more quickly with this agenda, is a tragedy.[1] 

As I say the Tories might be wrong, Cameron after all has often shown himself to be stupid, but I suspect in this instance they may be calling it correctly.


During the leadership elections Corbyn supporters enjoyed great freedom to criticize, never themselves having held responsibility for anything. So to all those professional oppositionists, who have yapped for years like petulant terriers around the ankles of those engaged in the mucky business of actually making hard decisions, if you imagine that people like me are now just going to say fair cop, games up, and go away, they are in for a rude awakening.

[1] Unlike Bin Laden’s assassination which was an important triumph. 

Popular posts from this blog

NESRINE MALIK AND THE UNSUNG VIRTUES OF HYPOCRISY

Image
As I write this a 27 year old woman, Mariam Ibrahim, has just had a baby in a Sudanese prison, ‘the condition of the mother and baby is not known as Ibrahim's lawyer and her husband, a US citizen, had been denied access to her. Omdurman women's prison has a basic clinic, where the child is thought to have been born. Ibrahim has been shackled since being imprisoned.’ [1]   Mariam also has an 18 month old child who is also being held in prison with her. The ‘crime’ for which she is imprisoned is apostasy, for which she has received the death sentence. She has also been sentenced to 100 lashes, for the additional crime of having sex with her Christian husband. Although she has been a lifelong Christian her father was a Muslim, Sudanese sharia law forbids women to marry outside the Muslim faith, men needless to say can do as they please in these matters. Mariam Ibrahim and her husband.  Nineteen countries punish their citizens for apostasy, and in 12 of those countries...
Read more

INTERVIEW WITH TOM VAGUE

Image
Tom Vague At the top end of All Saints Road there is a refuge, an enclave in which a local Bohemian culture retains a foothold, this is the Book & kitchen , a café/bookshop with adjoining terrace. Here the bustle of the nearby market gives way to conversation, conversation in the presence of images of the recent, and not so recent, past. The past of an area that has contributed so much to the life and culture of the city. I was there to meet local historian Mr Tom Vague a man intimately familiar with so much of this history. What Tom doesn’t know about the recent history of the area probably is not worth knowing. With Tom’s energy and effort Colville Community Forum, supported by City Living Local Life, recently held a gathering at The Book and Kitchen to celebrate this rich history. February 16 6-9 Pm, with Film Screening and Readings Exhibition February 16-26 2016. Featuring 30 Classic Westway Photographs and Posters. This represents one of a number of initiatives of t...
Read more

VOLINE AND TROTSKY

Волин и Троцкого A Footnote in Russian History In April 1917 the Russian anarchist revolutionary Voline* and Leon Trotsky were both stranded in New York as the Russian revolution broke out in Petrograd , inevitably coming into contact with one another. Voline stated that he felt that the Bolsheviks, given their ruthlessness and single minded determination, would ultimately come to power. They would then begin eliminating their opponents, amongst whom of course were the anarchists; this persecution would end with the Bolsheviks shooting the anarchists “like partridges.” Trotsky was dismissive, they might have their differences but they were comrades in arms, they had different interpretations of the revolutionary process but shared the same goals. It was nonsense to speak of Bolsheviks shooting revolutionary comrades, “we are socialists, comrade Voline! So we are not your enemies….” [1] In December of 1919, whilst gravely wounded Voline was captured by the Bolshe...
Read more