FOLLOW THE MONEY
A REVIEW OF LUKE HARDING'S SHADOW STATE
The empty plinth were the founder of the Cheka/NKVD/KGB Felix Derhinsky stood. Moscow September 1991
What happened next was an act of criminal folly far worse
than some of the worst clauses in the Treaty of Versailles.
The west in general and US in particular, chose, instead of assisting in the
creation of a viable democracy, to unleash the forces of predatory capitalism.
The result, unsurprisingly, was first chaos and then the emergence of a
criminal kleptocracy and finally the emergence of a mafia Don, Vladimir Putin,
who after destroying the power of the oligarchs became kleptocrat in chief.
So, no Treaty of Versailles, but humiliation enough to
energise anyone subject to intense feelings of grievance. Enter Vladimir Putin.
He was, in short, out for revenge. Harding describes in considerable detail
what form this revenge has taken. Some elements will be familiar, others less
so.
One significant departure from past practice by Soviet era subversion activities is significant and chilling. Hitherto getting found out and being exposed represented a failed mission. Plausible deniability was the paramount element of trade-craft. No longer, indeed in the case of the Litvinenko and the Salisbury murders part of the exercise was to leave a brazen calling card, - with callous disregard for the lives of bystanders, with the message to former Russian assets ‘you will not be safe anywhere,’ and to the target country literally ‘fuck you.’
That Trumps relationship with Putin is suspect is common
knowledge and Harding explores this in some detail. Trump, as Timothy Snyder
has pointed out, is a fiction, a TV character, a business failure leaving a
trail of destruction in his wake, he then re-invented himself as a successful
hot shot real estate mega star. His TV platform giving him the launching pad
for his Neo-fascist presidential campaign. Less well known is that it was Putin’s
Russia that provided the financial support to enable this fiction to be made
flesh. Harding explores the roots of the relationship between the two men, highlighting
the various intermediaries along the way. At heart however the exact nature of
the relationship is unknown, though it is clear that Trump is most certainly not
in the driving seat.
As I write this the much-anticipated Russia report has been released
in the UK. Produced by the parliamentary Committee tasked with the oversight of
the intelligence service, it is a damming indictment of government failure to
ensure the integrity of the mechanisms of British democracy , a failure
characterised by a wilful refusal to ask the question would*/did the Russian
government seek to influence British elections, and in particular the Brexit
referendum? We know why Johnson never asked the question, because he already
knew the answer, which was yes. In Johnson’s case ‘Deep Throats advice to, ‘follow
the money’ is the most apposite mantra.
Why Theresa May did
not ask for an investigation is a matter of speculation. One suspects internal
Tory party considerations meant were placed before the security of the country.
The morass is deep and the threat truly alarming. We risk
sleepwalking into a desert. The struggle has in many respects only just been
engaged. We have the likes of Luke Harding to thank that it has been engaged at
all.
*Evidence existed of such attempted interference before the
Brexit campaign.