SUMMER IN THE CITY: LONDON LETTER JUNE 2013
It’s been a depressing
period and my capacity to hold bad news is being severely tested. Some days it
feels like everything necessary for a civilised and humane society is being
consigned to the shredder. Legal Aid being the latest item on the Coalition
government’s list of items targeted for attention. Nick Cohen has written a
very depressing piece about this.[1]
Of course the preposterous
claim that ‘we are all equal before the law’ is risible, money always buying a better brand of justice; still with proper provision of legal
aid claimants and defendants at least were given a fighting chance. Now the
government have so constructed access that those from poor backgrounds will be
denied justice in a whole range of areas, from housing to welfare rights.
Within the criminal justice sphere the idea that the poor or even modestly wealthy
should enjoy choice of representation has been ditched, whilst even the notion of innocent until
proved guilty feels under attack.
Tom Brake MP |
As it happens I was in
striking distance of several Lib Dem politicians on Monday night, not to
mention some extraordinarily unpleasant Conservatives. Vince Cable passed close
enough for me to have landed a fairly solid punch.[2]
I was in the Committee Room corridor at the House of Commons for a meeting hosted by an organisation called Unlock Democracy. I have only been inside Parliament a handful of times and the thing that always strikes me is how shabby and run-down the place is; in some places it is literally falling apart. The second is what always occurs when you are in contact with people you ‘know’ through the media; this creates in the mind feelings of familiarity for you feel that they also know you. This can feel disconcerting. I recently found my self sitting next to the Theatre and opera director and polymath Jonathan Miller at the City Lit. I felt oddly compelled to say something, it feeling somehow rude not to acknowledge that I ‘knew’ him. Then found my self saying exactly what was in my head, -never a good idea. “Well,” I declared, “you’re the last person I was expecting to sit next to!”
I was in the Committee Room corridor at the House of Commons for a meeting hosted by an organisation called Unlock Democracy. I have only been inside Parliament a handful of times and the thing that always strikes me is how shabby and run-down the place is; in some places it is literally falling apart. The second is what always occurs when you are in contact with people you ‘know’ through the media; this creates in the mind feelings of familiarity for you feel that they also know you. This can feel disconcerting. I recently found my self sitting next to the Theatre and opera director and polymath Jonathan Miller at the City Lit. I felt oddly compelled to say something, it feeling somehow rude not to acknowledge that I ‘knew’ him. Then found my self saying exactly what was in my head, -never a good idea. “Well,” I declared, “you’re the last person I was expecting to sit next to!”
Back in the Commons I
resisted the temptation to wallop Vince Cable and, having been told that my
meeting had been re-located, made my way to the Grand Committee room to hear
speeches about the desperate need to reform the lobby system. There were calls
for transparency about who is being paid what and by whom to influence
government policy. After the speeches the meeting was opened up to comments and
questions. This space was immediately monopolised by someone from ‘Occupy’, who
indeed seemed determined to occupy what ever time was left. He too made a
speech. Much of what he said was true and said with real passion, though as one
of his major concerns was The Bilderberg Group, despite my self, I began to feel
edgy.
Bilderberg is inherently
anti democratic and hostile to open and transparent political debate. At worst,
in the absence of evidence to the contrary it raises serious concerns that
major political decisions are hammered out during deliberations there. At best
it represents a cosy forum in which ruling elites can get together to discover
how much they have in common with each other and how little with those whom
they seek to govern. Of course the likes of Aled Jones have successfully
marginalised all critics of Bilderberg as tin foil hat wearing conspiracy
fruitcakes. This allowed Ken Clark along with a sycophantic Ed Balls in the House
of Commons, to laugh off criticism of the group. He and they should not be
allowed to get away with this.
Oliver Cromwell |
THE MACE |
‘…St Peters in Rome is the architectural symbol of the escape from
Catholicism, of the beginning of the lay world, of the beginning of the
secularisation of mankind.’
I read this passage
startled by the power of its counter intuitive insight.
Herzen is the least well
known of Russian Nineteenth century writers and despite attempts by E H Carr in
the 1930’s and Isaiah Berlin in the 1940’s and 50’s[5]
he remains for many interested in Russian history little more than a footnote. Though
like Shakespeare, Mozart, or Karl Marx he bursts out of narrow national
boundaries and belongs to a wider European cultural tradition. He deserves greater appreciation.
As it happens he lived in
exile in London for a good part of his life, indeed not far from
where I live now. This has given me an added sense of connection.
Have also just finished
reading Edward Lucas the 'New Cold War.' As a dissection of Putin’s Russia it is
powerful indictment not only of Putin but the complicity of many in western
Europe in supporting his mob style governance. Lucas however has a blind spot,
his belief in the beneficence of free market capitalism. Whilst critical of
some aspects of the Yeltsin years at no stage does he concede that introducing
unfettered free market capitalism into the Russia of the early 1990’s was an act of insanity. Not
only did it came close to destroying Russia as a viable nation state but laid
the foundation for Putin's Mafia rule.
It also contains examples
of the continuing use of psychiatry by the Russian state to silent dissent, citing
the example of Larisa Arap an opposition activist, forcibly incarcerated and
medicated for 44 days. Thus a practice associated with the
totalitarian Soviet state has been resurrected in Putin’s Russia .[6]
The G8 meeting has just
concluded and it looks as if Putin has, (despite all the spin to the
contrary), sabotaged any attempt to try and resolve the conflict in Syria . This was always going to happen if unanimity was
sought at the price of everything else. What should have happened was the isolation of Putin. A open recognition of what The
Canadian Prime minister, Steven Harper, named as the reality, it is now to all
intents and purposes G7 +1.
Given thatRussia was always going to block serious progress
respecting the Syrian conflict the 7 should have issued a separate response,
leaving Putin standing alone. Putin genuinely feared this and Harper’s comments seem
to have really rattled Putin.[7]
Sooner or later Putin will
have to be called out, better now when we still have a strong hand. As to the issues of
transparency respecting tax and ownership I wish anyone well in looking into
the corporate affairs of Gazprom.[8]Given that
Respecting the flagrant tax
evasion undertaken by Corporations like Amazon, Google, Starbucks and Apple enough
already of the line, “we do nothing illegal, we abide by the law.” This is the
moral equivalent of the man who regularly beats his wife in a country where
this is permitted declaring that he is a good man who always observes the law
of the land.
Alex Talbot 19/06/13
[2] Can I say that I wholly
disapprove of landing blows on Mr Vince Cable or any other politician and I
find this desire in my self to be wholly reprehensible.
[3] The Mace being a baton,
symbol of the Commons independence from the Crown; this is what Cromwell said
when abolishing The venal and self serving so called Long Parliament. Cromwell
went on however to establish a dictatorship, not something I favour.
[4] Lenin greatly venerated his
writings, which to me rather suggests that Lenin did not really understand him.
[5] EH Carr The Romantic
Exiles 1935 and Isaiah Belin Russian Thinkers Hogarth Press 1948. Penguin have
also produced a copy of the latter book.
[6] In his account of his
journey travelling in Russia
in 1839 The Marquise De Custine writes about a man who wrote a critique of the
Orthodox faith. The authorities arrested the man and declared him insane. He
was then placed into an insane asylum. ‘Journey For Our Time’ Marquis De
Custine, Published 1980 George Prior Publisher p 240. Say what you will about
Russian dictatorial regimes, they are nothing if not consistent. Of course from
the Viewpoint of a Tsarist official, a Stalinist Commissar or a police official in Putin's Russia anyone who questions the authority of such an
all powerful state must be insane!
[7] People who rattle Putin to
this extent at home very quickly find themselves arrested on some spurious
charge, usually tax related, though in some cases find themselves very dead indeed.
I know little about Mr Harper but on Putin he got it right.
[8] Putin’s enmeshment with
Gazprom could prove to be his Achilles heel see: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-06-09/gazprom-s-demise-could-topple-putin.html