TALES OF MORAL SQUALOR
After two years in which
Russia and Iran have been supplying Assad with arms, after Hezbollah has
committed thousands of fighters and in which Assad has used, leaving aside the
clear indication of chemical weapons, tanks and artillery against defenceless
civilians, the US has finally committed itself to supplying the rebels with
arms. Cue the Stop the War Coalition[STWC], who as a consequence will be
demonstrating outside the US embassy in Grosvenor Square today .
Not once have they called
for mass demonstrations outside the Iranian or Russian embassies. Not once protested
Putin’s unwavering commitment to Assad. No, the crowd -who only a few years back
were chanting "we are all Hezbollah now," -single out only the US for its rage and adolescent vitriol.
Now a case could be made
for not supporting those fighting the Assad regime, a moral position – just –
could be made for not supplying arms to either side and using sanctions and every means of pressure to bear on the regime to negotiate a change of government.
However since the Russians, Iranians, and to a lesser extent the Chinese would
not co-operate, such a course of action has been long dead in the water.
There
is also an, essentially pacifist, case against the use of violence in any
circumstances, including the use of force against the Baathist Fascism of
Assad.
You note that neither position
is that of STWC.[1]
The indignation of this squalid crowd is directed purely at the US and UK in particular, and ‘the West’ in general. This
might bring you to the conclusion that STWC is little more that a pro Assad/pro
Iranian front organisation, a bunch of fellow travellers.[2]
What the STWC want is an Assad victory; the rest is just the sophistry and
verbiage, seeking to conceal the moral squalor of this aim and present their position as being ‘progressive.’
Such people are way beyond shame.
Lindsay German |
*The last time I was there was to protest Reagan's invasion of Grenada
[1] It is perhaps superfluous to
say that neither position would be supported by me, the first for the reasons I
have given, the Russians would sabotage it and it also treats Assad and his
opponents in the Free Syrian Army as morally equivalent. The second as I am not
a pacifist and believe that evil such as that personified by Bashar Assad can only be removed by violent means,
[2] I was going to add 'some
possibly unwittingly,' though felt it would too greatly impugn the intelligence
of the likes of Jeremy Corbyn and Caroline Lucas to suggest that they could be
that stupid. In supporting the Assad regime they will be joining the British
National Party’s fascist leader Nick Griffin. If ever there was a symbol of the
game being given away that it it.
[3] Convenor of the STWC.