LIBEL TOURISM: THE COURTS JUMP BEFORE THEY ARE PUSHED
Avaricious lawyers were dealt
a blow this week earned by a ruling from Mr Justice Simon. The judge struck out
a lawsuit brought by Pavel Karpov, a retired Russian interior ministry
investigator, i.e. senior policeman, who was seeking to argue that his
reputation had been destroyed by being linked to the death of lawyer Sergei
Magnitsky.[1]
Mr Justice Simon |
This case had about it all
the hallmarks of similar actions brought about by foreign individuals and
corporations with little, if any, connection to this country, making use of
British libel Law. This practice has proved as lucrative for many British law
firms as it has been disastrous for free speech.
As interpreted by the
courts our draconian libel laws recognised few boundaries or constraints. This
saw a string of foreign nationals, many of them extremely dodgy characters,
using British libel law to silence their critics.
‘In
many cases, British courts accepted jurisdiction over cases which were not even
actionable in the countries where the main publication occurred. The
Polish-born film director Roman Polanski used the High Court to sue the
American magazine Vanity Fair in 2005 over an article which claimed he had
tried to seduce a woman while he was on his way to his wife’s funeral in 1969.[2]’
Polanski, a convicted
child sex offender was even permitted to give evidence by video link, lest he
face extradition to the US should he attend in person. Polanski was eventually
awarded £50,000 damages, and the case is widely held to have seriously damaged Britain ’s judicial reputation.
The trend had by this
stage become an international scandal
and prompted some American States to pass legislation to prevent “unreasonable” libel rulings made in British
courts infringing on their own freedom of speech.’[3]
Finally parliament slowly
began to stir, prompted by a growing campaign for libel law reform. As a
consequence a new Defamation Act will come into law next year, making it much
harder for litigants from other countries to use UK courts.
This is the context for
this weeks ruling. I would like to believe that we have discovered that even
the legal profession can blush, however I suspect that they jumped before they
were pushed.
[1] See http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-20626960
The costs of bringing this case are estimated at around £2m, how a mere
policeman, not matter how senior, can afford to bring such a case I leave
hanging in the air.
[3] Ibid
Having visited this page I would be grateful for your feedback, either tick one of the boxes below or make a comment via the comments button.