MR SHAPPS AND THE BBC: THE FREEDOM OF THE PRESS 1


What makes defending freedom of the press in this country so difficult is the fact that so much of it is so crap. The press is crap primarily becuase of those that own it. Would you really put Rupert Murdoch, Paul Dacre or Richard Desmond in charge of anything as significant as the Brighton and Hove Advertiser if you had any say in the matter? Still be it ever so crap it needs to be kept well clear of even the smell of political interference.
Firstly I will say that the proposed involvement of Parliament in establishing the legal basis for press regulation is not that draconian and it is certainly not the end of press freedom as we know it as some of the more hysterical commentators would have you believe. Still at the heart off the matter is an inviolable principle, that parliament should not be let anywhere near the regulation of press conduct.

Those proposing the change do not understand this principle; some indeed choose to cite the BBC as an example of a news organisation that is regulated and yet enjoys complete editorial freedom and independence. After this weekends comments by the appalling Mr Grant Shapps, the Chairman of the Conservative Party, I suspect they may not be quite so keen to draw on that analogy.[1]

The success of Mr Shapps intimidation of the BBC will be in the very nature of such things invisible, self censorship being the most effective. A story toned down here, subtle changes to wording, an investigation simply not commissioned “in the current climate.” In the run up to charter and licence fee renewal the BBC will tread carefully indeed, every effort will be made to ensure that nothing too controversial, nothing that could upset the government, will find its way onto our screens or the airwaves. With what is going to be an extremely hard fought general election looming, this suits the coalition government perfectly. What the oily Mr Shapps intended by his remarks was a reminder to the BBC of the hard fact that it is the government that controls the purse strings; though true to form he spoke with all the subtly of the saloon bar bully.[2]

Mr Shapps, who cannot stop grinning, as if he were the recipient of a insidious private joke,* is not the first politician to bully the BBC, this is a well trodden path, Blair and his sidekick Alistair Campbell for example, also did a pretty good job.

These are the same politicians who now want, for the first time, to involve themselves in regulation of the press.

Trust us, they say, politicians will be at one remove, they would only be involved in underpinning statuary regulation; this will satisfy many.
Think now about the creepy Mr Shapps, do you want such a man even within smelling distance of a free press? A man who would not recognise a public interest defence if it bit him on the ass.
Also remember once you let politicians into the same room as press regulation, no matter how little, they are there to stay and after a period of time, particularly when they have been on the receiving end of some rough treatment at the hands of newspaper editors, they may decide they want to take up a little more room
.   

*Which of course after a fashion, given that the Tories are governing as if they had been given an overwhelming public mandate, he is.


[2] Mr Shapps called into question the ‘credibility’ of the BBC. This from a man recently censured by the Office of National Statistics for misrepresenting statistical data!


Having visited this page I would be grateful for your feedback, either tick one of the boxes below or make a comment via the comments button.

Popular posts from this blog

NESRINE MALIK AND THE UNSUNG VIRTUES OF HYPOCRISY

Image
As I write this a 27 year old woman, Mariam Ibrahim, has just had a baby in a Sudanese prison, ‘the condition of the mother and baby is not known as Ibrahim's lawyer and her husband, a US citizen, had been denied access to her. Omdurman women's prison has a basic clinic, where the child is thought to have been born. Ibrahim has been shackled since being imprisoned.’ [1]   Mariam also has an 18 month old child who is also being held in prison with her. The ‘crime’ for which she is imprisoned is apostasy, for which she has received the death sentence. She has also been sentenced to 100 lashes, for the additional crime of having sex with her Christian husband. Although she has been a lifelong Christian her father was a Muslim, Sudanese sharia law forbids women to marry outside the Muslim faith, men needless to say can do as they please in these matters. Mariam Ibrahim and her husband.  Nineteen countries punish their citizens for apostasy, and in 12 of those countries...
Read more

INTERVIEW WITH TOM VAGUE

Image
Tom Vague At the top end of All Saints Road there is a refuge, an enclave in which a local Bohemian culture retains a foothold, this is the Book & kitchen , a café/bookshop with adjoining terrace. Here the bustle of the nearby market gives way to conversation, conversation in the presence of images of the recent, and not so recent, past. The past of an area that has contributed so much to the life and culture of the city. I was there to meet local historian Mr Tom Vague a man intimately familiar with so much of this history. What Tom doesn’t know about the recent history of the area probably is not worth knowing. With Tom’s energy and effort Colville Community Forum, supported by City Living Local Life, recently held a gathering at The Book and Kitchen to celebrate this rich history. February 16 6-9 Pm, with Film Screening and Readings Exhibition February 16-26 2016. Featuring 30 Classic Westway Photographs and Posters. This represents one of a number of initiatives of t...
Read more

VOLINE AND TROTSKY

Волин и Троцкого A Footnote in Russian History In April 1917 the Russian anarchist revolutionary Voline* and Leon Trotsky were both stranded in New York as the Russian revolution broke out in Petrograd , inevitably coming into contact with one another. Voline stated that he felt that the Bolsheviks, given their ruthlessness and single minded determination, would ultimately come to power. They would then begin eliminating their opponents, amongst whom of course were the anarchists; this persecution would end with the Bolsheviks shooting the anarchists “like partridges.” Trotsky was dismissive, they might have their differences but they were comrades in arms, they had different interpretations of the revolutionary process but shared the same goals. It was nonsense to speak of Bolsheviks shooting revolutionary comrades, “we are socialists, comrade Voline! So we are not your enemies….” [1] In December of 1919, whilst gravely wounded Voline was captured by the Bolshe...
Read more