LONDON LETTER JUNE 2014

Camus, Penguins, the Shadow of Islamism and the Incompetence of Rebekah Brooks

Sometimes I just wish that time would slow down a little. Already approaching July the year is passing at a giddy pace. I have been busy with the citizen journalism class and a little teaching of history. Today off to discuss co-facilitating a group on the origins of World War One.
The weather has been glorious and in the sunshine London feels like a more civilised city. This morning I caught a little of Farming Today, an early morning BBC radio programme aimed at the farming community. Apparently it is the hay making season. Consequently some people today will be making hay whilst the sun shines. I find this as strangely satisfying as reflecting upon the fact that it was someone’s responsibility, possibly a junior cabin boy, to both arrange and of course re-arrange the deckchairs on the Titanic.
Albert Camus
I am currently reading Camus, The Plague. I recently re-read the Outsider and read The Fall for the first time. The Outsider and The Fall perfectly dovetail, dealing as they do with central questions of guilt and morality. The great crime of Meursault, the central figure of The Outsider, is that he feels no guilt; not that he is a psychopath, but that he lives simply for the moment, guilt serves no purpose in his life. Though locked up in a prison cell and sentenced to death he is free. It is this freedom that at first perplexes and then tortures the priest who has come to coax a confession out of him. The scene were Meursault, irritated beyond further endurance by the stream of pious babble, forcibly evicts the priest from his cell is one of the great moments in modern literature. The Fall comes at the same issues from an opposite angle, the central character, a lawyer Jean-Baptiste Clamence, seems to lead an exemplary life. Suddenly one evening he experiences the sensation of being laughed at which induces in him the feeling that the fraudulence at the core of his existence is being exposed. His life, no longer felt as authentic, begins to unravel.
Both novels, permeated with an underlying sense of unease, are deeply unsettling. Great writing should be unsettling, should make you start to view the world differently. Camus’s writing consists of a series of hand grenades thrown into modern consciousness.
I have also just finished reading Penguin Lost by Andrey Kurkov’s follow up to the remarkable Death and The Penguin. Kurkov, a Ukrainian writer whose characters have to survive in the murky post-Soviet republic, provides startlingly surreal images written in a realistic style. The plots are in the true sense of the word fantastic and wholly improbable, but in their very absurdity reveal more truth about the human condition than any number of more ‘realistic’ accounts of the post-Soviet world.
Sam Harris
As to non-fiction I would like to group three books I have also just read into a single review, this will appear shortly. The End of Faith by Sam Harris, On Offence, The Politics of Indignation by Richard King and Douglas Murray’s Islamaphilia, all touch upon one of the central issues of multiculturalism and religious, particularly Moslem, sensibilities, in an open and free society. The degree of retreat from liberal values and a defence of free speech in the face of a prolonged assault from the Islamacist movement since the Rushdie affair represents the greatest defeat for free speech since the early 1960’s and the first time since the 18th Century that writers have been silenced on pain of death. All this has occurred against the background of collective denial, the great pretence that free speech remains unmolested that writers remain free to speak truth to power, indeed truth to religion.
Just this morning I read in the paper of a conference in Sydney entitled, “Honour killings are morally justified,”- note that the organisers did not even feel the need to insert a question mark. The keynote speaker was to be Uthman Badar from that well known hotbed of rational thinking the Islamic group Hizb ut-Tahrir, a group which welcomes the current operations of ISIS in Iraq, describing it as part of the ‘Arab Spring!’
Of course being the old cultural imperialist that I am it is not surprising that I am horrified by the prospect of such a conference. I realise I still have much work to do to understand why a father would feel himself justified in bashing out the brains of his fifteen year old daughter. I don’t have the nuanced understanding of complex cultural issues that underlie such murders. I should understand more and condemn a little less. I am it seems, to quote Mr Badar just another of those “secular liberal Islamophobes [who] would come out of every dark corner, foaming at the mouth.”[1]
Now for the record Mr Badar says he is against so called honour killings, though I’m not sure how well this soft liberalism goes down back at branch meetings. It also happens that the conference has been cancelled and Mr Badar consequently was not allowed to enlighten the world with his views. Now I deplore this and would defend the right of Mr Badar to be heard,[2] this of course is more than Mr Badar and his ilk would afford me should I choose to speak at a conference entitled ‘Mohamed the Fraud.’  Now however Mr Badar whinges about the fact that he has been denied the freedom of speech he would so happily deny to others and that is so absent in the Islamic world. Whilst the conference organiser whines,   “I never wanted to expose someone, who agreed to take on this issue for us in good faith, to a barrage of criticism…”[3]  Well he can reassure himself in one way in that Mr Badar can sleep safely in the knowledge that no matter how angry his critics there will not be an evangelical Christian suicide squad assembling in the heart of the Midwest bent on separating Mr Badar’s head from his shoulders.
All the pathetic liberal apologists for Islamism bring to mind an image provided by Pascal Bruckner when discussing his book The Tyranny of Guilt, he conjures up a scene from the film Mars Attack when guitar strumming peace loving hippies greet the newly arrived Martian hordes. “Hi man, welcome, peace and love, plenty for everyone man.” They are all promptly incinerated.
Another much sadder image, pathetic in the real sense of the word, is that of the Dutch film maker Theo van Gogh pleading for his life as some Muslim fanatic hacked away at him with a knife. “Can’t we just talk about this?”
The likes of Al Qaeda, Boko Horam, ISIS and the myriad other Islamacist groups mushrooming across the globe are not for talking, except if your idea of dialogue involves abject surrender of every principle of freedom of conscience, individual liberty and free speech. They only really understand force. If that thought makes you uncomfortable tough, you’d had better acclimatize yourself to it.
Rebekah Brooks and Tony Blair
Since I began writing this the verdicts in the phone hacking trial have come in. It seems that Rebekah Brooks’ defence that she was the most naïve and incompetent newspaper editor in the history of Fleet Street in that she was clueless about how the paper she was editing was getting its exclusives, was successful. If this victory I wouldn’t shout about it too loudly if I were her.
On the day that saw the other former editor of the News of The World convicted on the charge of illegal phone tapping, the case having revealed the stench of corruption and criminality leading right to the very top of News International, Rupert Murdoch’s tabloid The Sun chose to lead with the headline A Great Day for the Red Tops.[4] This propagates such a distorted version of reality that it would do credit to a North Korean newspaper.
The News From the Republic of Rupert Murdoch
Such are the thoughts that pass through my mind during sunny days in London in June.
AT
June 2014



[1] http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jun/25/cancelled-honour-killings-talk-did-not-aim-to-justify-says-organiser as to why we secular liberals, Islamophobes or not, should lurk in dark corners I am unclear. Of course in truth the vast majority of secular liberals are falling over themselves to appease the likes of Mr Badar.
[2] Though would also, had the event been held anywhere near me have sought to attend and protest.
[3] Ibid
[4] A cute reference to the colour of Rebekah Brooks hair and the colloquial name for tabloid newspapers.


Popular posts from this blog

NESRINE MALIK AND THE UNSUNG VIRTUES OF HYPOCRISY

INTERVIEW WITH TOM VAGUE

VOLINE AND TROTSKY