ON RELIGION PART 2: THE INVISIBLE FRIEND

‘Philosophers stretch the meaning of words until they retain scarcely anything of their original sense. They give the name of "God" to some vague abstraction which they have created for themselves; having done so they can pose before all the world as deists, as believers of God, and they can even boast that they have recognized a higher, purer concept of God, notwithstanding that their God is not nothing more than an insubstantial shadow and no longer the mighty personality of religious doctrines.’

--Sigmund Freud (from The Future of an Illusion)

The 1980’s and 90’s saw an explosion in the self-help 12-Step ‘recovery’ movement. Everything from eating disorders, to love and sex ‘addiction,’ advocates claimed could be effectively addressed by regularly attending meetings devoted to the 12-Step philosophy. At the core of this philosophy lies a religious/spiritual[1] outlook that posits a belief in a ‘higher power’ to arrest – adherents do not believe in cure – there addictive problems.[2] This power can be defined in whatever way the group member chooses. Unsurprisingly most choose what I will call, following the example of Bill Maher, the ‘invisible friend’ model.
In Western Europe the twentieth century witnessed the steady decline in church attendance, a decline in belief in the core tenants of Christianity and growing secularisation. As the God of the desert began to lose his attraction a new god began to emerge, altogether much more in tune with the age, much more tolerant, ‘touchy feely’ and approachable. Indeed this God positively encourages one to one contact. Available 24/7, a psycho-therapeutic god, an invisible friend. 
Ever since the protestant Reformation this new god slowly began to emerge with the rejection of priestly intercession between believer and God. Now a more personal relationship became possible.
The eventual result being that there are now innumerable individuals who describe themselves as believers, sometimes even as Christians, who never attend any organised form of worship, aside from weddings, christenings and funerals, often choosing elements from different religious doctrines, in an eclectic pick and mix, a little Buddhist meditation, little bit of fasting and self-denial, the worship of a few sacred objects; and at the core a belief in an invisible friend with whom they communicate regularly.

Many argue that this is an improvement on the autocratic and inflexible doctrines of organised religion. This is possible. However one only has to witness the incredible selfish narcissistic solipsism at the heart of such a belief system to harbour serious doubts. Children might be massacred in a school in Gaza, Yazidis murdered or driven from their homes but God is indifferent to all this, your invisible friend is too busy looking after you and your family.   

[1] Advocates for the philosophy will insist that ‘the programme’ is spiritual rather than religious since it allows members to define God in any way they choose. Some may feel this is a distinction without a difference, particularly as the Lord’s Prayer is still used in some US and Irish meetings of AA, the founding fellowships of the philosophy. AA originated in the mid 1930’s in the American Bible Belt.
[2] The Serenity Prayer is an integral part of AA and NA (Narcotics Anonymous) meetings.
‘ God grant me the serenity
to accept the things I cannot change;
courage to change the things I can;
and wisdom to know the difference.’

The longer version provides the religious ethos of the 12-Step programme in a nutshell.

‘Living one day at a time;
Enjoying one moment at a time;
Accepting hardships as the pathway to peace;
Taking, as He did, this sinful world
as it is, not as I would have it;
Trusting that He will make all things right
if I surrender to His Will;
That I may be reasonably happy in this life
and supremely happy with Him
Forever in the next.’

Popular posts from this blog

NESRINE MALIK AND THE UNSUNG VIRTUES OF HYPOCRISY

Image
As I write this a 27 year old woman, Mariam Ibrahim, has just had a baby in a Sudanese prison, ‘the condition of the mother and baby is not known as Ibrahim's lawyer and her husband, a US citizen, had been denied access to her. Omdurman women's prison has a basic clinic, where the child is thought to have been born. Ibrahim has been shackled since being imprisoned.’ [1]   Mariam also has an 18 month old child who is also being held in prison with her. The ‘crime’ for which she is imprisoned is apostasy, for which she has received the death sentence. She has also been sentenced to 100 lashes, for the additional crime of having sex with her Christian husband. Although she has been a lifelong Christian her father was a Muslim, Sudanese sharia law forbids women to marry outside the Muslim faith, men needless to say can do as they please in these matters. Mariam Ibrahim and her husband.  Nineteen countries punish their citizens for apostasy, and in 12 of those countries...
Read more

INTERVIEW WITH TOM VAGUE

Image
Tom Vague At the top end of All Saints Road there is a refuge, an enclave in which a local Bohemian culture retains a foothold, this is the Book & kitchen , a café/bookshop with adjoining terrace. Here the bustle of the nearby market gives way to conversation, conversation in the presence of images of the recent, and not so recent, past. The past of an area that has contributed so much to the life and culture of the city. I was there to meet local historian Mr Tom Vague a man intimately familiar with so much of this history. What Tom doesn’t know about the recent history of the area probably is not worth knowing. With Tom’s energy and effort Colville Community Forum, supported by City Living Local Life, recently held a gathering at The Book and Kitchen to celebrate this rich history. February 16 6-9 Pm, with Film Screening and Readings Exhibition February 16-26 2016. Featuring 30 Classic Westway Photographs and Posters. This represents one of a number of initiatives of t...
Read more

VOLINE AND TROTSKY

Волин и Троцкого A Footnote in Russian History In April 1917 the Russian anarchist revolutionary Voline* and Leon Trotsky were both stranded in New York as the Russian revolution broke out in Petrograd , inevitably coming into contact with one another. Voline stated that he felt that the Bolsheviks, given their ruthlessness and single minded determination, would ultimately come to power. They would then begin eliminating their opponents, amongst whom of course were the anarchists; this persecution would end with the Bolsheviks shooting the anarchists “like partridges.” Trotsky was dismissive, they might have their differences but they were comrades in arms, they had different interpretations of the revolutionary process but shared the same goals. It was nonsense to speak of Bolsheviks shooting revolutionary comrades, “we are socialists, comrade Voline! So we are not your enemies….” [1] In December of 1919, whilst gravely wounded Voline was captured by the Bolshe...
Read more