BOOKS AND PRISONERS

POLITICIANS AND POWER 


Chris Grayling 
Politicians are rarely as dishonest as when they speak of devolving power. ‘Power to the people,’ ‘localism,’ ‘decentralisation,’ ‘local decisions made by local people,’ the slogans and promises come out at election time like daffodils in spring and last just about as long. As to giving away power this is the one thing politicians resist with a fervour and passion worthy of the great causes of any age. For a politician power is the very stuff of life, it is the one thing that gets them up in the morning, it’s what turns them on, it is there very raison d’être.
Now of course there have been instances of politicians surrendering power; two recent instances in particular involved substantial surrender of power and control, Freedom of Information and devolution to Scotland and Wales. Both instances came from the left and were born of real idealism, particularly the former; however the latter also contained strong elements of pragmatic, even cynical, electoral considerations, primarily a desperate need to defuse the power of the Scots Nationalists.
Whilst respecting FOI Tony Blair tried to blunt the legislation by imposing Jack Straw, that political equivalent of a wet Monday in March, on its legislative progress. Even with Straw’s attempts to blunt the legislation however FOI has proved a valuable tool in the hands of the media and public. So much so that Tony Blair described the legislation as his worst decision in government. At this point irony grips it heart, topples and falls down dead.
 But for all their blather about ‘localism’ and the small state it is the Tories who most love to centralise and control from Whitehall.
The inevitable drift to control and micro management could not be better illustrated than by the Justice Minister, Chris Grayling, who has now decided to centralise control of prison discipline. Gone the discretion of governors, gone too the right of prisoners to receive packages from family, gone the right of prisoners to receive books.

That a policy like this will lead to a steady build up of rage amongst prisoners that is likely to result in a bloody explosion, is simply secondary to this obsession with control. Feelings of impotence and disaffection amongst prison staff and those seeking to support and rehabilitate prisoners will also be a consequence, which, combined with prison overcrowding acerbated by poor quality of prison staff, a consequence of outsourcing, is a recipe for disaster. Should such riots take place Chris Grayling and his ilk will of course deny any culpability.
I have consequently written to Mr Grayling, yet again

Dear Mr Grayling,

I see that you have now centralized all powers related to prison discipline. Decisions once subject to the discretion of individual governors are now concentrated in Whitehall, with a ban on prisoners receiving packages, including the sending of books, and indeed such seditious items as children's home made birthday cards!

And yet once again you are being dishonest; you state…"Prisoners' access to reading material is not being curtailed." Can I provide a definition of curtailed ‘reduce in extent or quantity; impose a restriction on.’ Under the new regulations prisoners will no longer be able to receive books as presents; consequently prisoner’s access to reading material is being curtailed.
You could have said, we are not preventing prisoners from accessing books and this would be true, but the amount of that access is now to be much more restricted. Prisoners can only now access books from the prison library service, those they can afford to purchase from prison earnings or money sent in to them, # though in the latter two circumstances books can only be ordered from a catalogue approved by the Ministry of Justice. How can I access this catalogue, is it available online?
You will be aware that prison libraries are now themselves being subjected to local authority cutbacks, and that access to libraries within prison can often be severely restricted.

I can think of nothing more damaging to prisoner rehabilitation than restricted access to reading material. This policy represents the most short sighted and mean spirited dogma; this crude carrot and stick philosophy emerges only from those who know how to control and punish but not how to engage, empathize and rehabilitate. It will end in tears, though I doubt they will be your own.


#Though I am not sure that this last point is correct, perhaps you could clarify?

Yours truly,

AT *

If you wanted to create a cocktail of mean spiritedness and inhumanity mixed with deep stupidity, restricting prisoner’s access to books would be it. Just when you thought this government could sink no lower they constantly trump you.
At the heart of this dreary and rather sinister little saga there is a moral. At all costs try to avoid falling into the clutches of the state, either as a consequence of poverty or by falling foul of the law. If you do you will fall into the hands of the likes of Mr Grayling who enjoy exercising power over those over whom they exercise control. Believe me this is not something you want to happen.

*Previously Mr Grayling has responded to my e mails, I doubt he will do so this time.



Having visited this page I would be grateful for your feedback, either tick one of the boxes below or make a comment via the comments button.

Popular posts from this blog

NESRINE MALIK AND THE UNSUNG VIRTUES OF HYPOCRISY

INTERVIEW WITH TOM VAGUE

VOLINE AND TROTSKY