RUSSIA AND THE CRIMEA: THE DANZIG OF THE UKRAINIAN RUSSIAN DISPUTE

So surprise surprise, Vladimir Putin has not opted for the softly softly diplomatic approach to the Ukraine uprising. As I write this the story is fast developing, with the Crimean peninsular centre stage. This development was predictable for anyone with the slightest knowledge of the history of the region. What has gone largely unreported in the west is the fact that Khrushchev 'gave' this predominantly Russian region to the Ukraine in 1954. It could never occur to anyone back in those days that the USSR would collapse, and that Ukraine would no longer be a part of it. This transfer was made ‘illegally’ under the then Soviet constitution and a very great many Russians, particularly those living in the peninsular, have never been reconciled to this state of affairs. I think it a pretty safe bet that Putin is one of them.

In 1939 Danzig was unmistakably a German city whose population had voted overwhelmingly in favour of unification with Germany. German claims to Danzig were legitimate; its separation from the rest of Germany was one of the least defensible articles of the treaty of Versailles. The problem lay with the person and regime making the claim. Had the claim been made by a Social Democratic German state some sort of deal, probably in the face of Polish resistance, could have been made.
So it is with the Crimea. Unfortunately for Putin an agreement was signed in 1994 with the Unites States, Russia and the UK guarantying Ukraine's sovereignty and territorial integrity in exchange for [Ukraine] surrendering its nuclear arsenal. They also agreed to ‘refrain from economic coercion designed to subordinate Ukraine to their own interests’ (Budapest Protocols). This agreement, though Putin would never have signed such a document, held good so long as Putin successfully held the Ukraine within the Russian orbit. With the Orange Revolution and now the February uprising, Putin’s strategy has unravelled. In truth he overplayed his hand last year by coercing Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych into backing away from greater alignment with the EU. Now just as he feels this separation most keenly he is presented with an opportunity to exploit the anxieties of the Russian speaking majority in the region.
Over the Crimea Putin has a good case, the Russian population would probably vote overwhelmingly for reunification. Should he choose to patiently negotiate with the Ukraine, EU and the US he could certainly negotiate a package giving increased autonomy to the region, a package that protected Russian strategic interests, especially the presence of the Black Sea fleet at Sevastopol.
Putin however does not do subtle, nor does he do patience, he is too stupid. So we now see goons in full combat gear without identification markings seizing key strategic points,* being reinforced by large transport aircraft disgorging troops into the isthmus.
This is Georgia all over again. Putin sees negotiating over events ‘in his own backyard’ as humiliating, he will not do it. It is likely that the non Russian population of Crimea will be paying the price for Putin’s impatience.

*Putin’s Russian media would have you believe that these are merely concerned Russian speakers on the isthmus. Fortunately they seem to have all the training and equipment of special forces; handy that!

   
Having visited this page I would be grateful for your feedback, either tick one of the boxes below or make a comment via the comments button.

Popular posts from this blog

NESRINE MALIK AND THE UNSUNG VIRTUES OF HYPOCRISY

Image
As I write this a 27 year old woman, Mariam Ibrahim, has just had a baby in a Sudanese prison, ‘the condition of the mother and baby is not known as Ibrahim's lawyer and her husband, a US citizen, had been denied access to her. Omdurman women's prison has a basic clinic, where the child is thought to have been born. Ibrahim has been shackled since being imprisoned.’ [1]   Mariam also has an 18 month old child who is also being held in prison with her. The ‘crime’ for which she is imprisoned is apostasy, for which she has received the death sentence. She has also been sentenced to 100 lashes, for the additional crime of having sex with her Christian husband. Although she has been a lifelong Christian her father was a Muslim, Sudanese sharia law forbids women to marry outside the Muslim faith, men needless to say can do as they please in these matters. Mariam Ibrahim and her husband.  Nineteen countries punish their citizens for apostasy, and in 12 of those countries...
Read more

INTERVIEW WITH TOM VAGUE

Image
Tom Vague At the top end of All Saints Road there is a refuge, an enclave in which a local Bohemian culture retains a foothold, this is the Book & kitchen , a café/bookshop with adjoining terrace. Here the bustle of the nearby market gives way to conversation, conversation in the presence of images of the recent, and not so recent, past. The past of an area that has contributed so much to the life and culture of the city. I was there to meet local historian Mr Tom Vague a man intimately familiar with so much of this history. What Tom doesn’t know about the recent history of the area probably is not worth knowing. With Tom’s energy and effort Colville Community Forum, supported by City Living Local Life, recently held a gathering at The Book and Kitchen to celebrate this rich history. February 16 6-9 Pm, with Film Screening and Readings Exhibition February 16-26 2016. Featuring 30 Classic Westway Photographs and Posters. This represents one of a number of initiatives of t...
Read more

VOLINE AND TROTSKY

Волин и Троцкого A Footnote in Russian History In April 1917 the Russian anarchist revolutionary Voline* and Leon Trotsky were both stranded in New York as the Russian revolution broke out in Petrograd , inevitably coming into contact with one another. Voline stated that he felt that the Bolsheviks, given their ruthlessness and single minded determination, would ultimately come to power. They would then begin eliminating their opponents, amongst whom of course were the anarchists; this persecution would end with the Bolsheviks shooting the anarchists “like partridges.” Trotsky was dismissive, they might have their differences but they were comrades in arms, they had different interpretations of the revolutionary process but shared the same goals. It was nonsense to speak of Bolsheviks shooting revolutionary comrades, “we are socialists, comrade Voline! So we are not your enemies….” [1] In December of 1919, whilst gravely wounded Voline was captured by the Bolshe...
Read more