THE REAL BBC BIAS

Nick Robinson BBC's Political Editor

THE ASSUMPTIONS BEHIND MR ROBINSON'S QUESTION


The SNP’s attempt to intimidate the BBC in the run up to the referendum vote this Thursday would do credit to Vladimir Putin. The catalyst for the Yes campaign’s attack on the BBC was an exchange between Alex Salmond and the BBC’s Political Editor Nick Robinson. In all the acrimonious exchanges that have followed on from this exchange, which culminated in protests outside BBC Scotland calling for the sacking of Nick Robinson, one aspect of Nick Robinson’s question seem to have gone unremarked. That is its inherent disrespect for elected politicians per se. 

Why should a Scottish voter believe you, a politician, against men who are responsible for billions of pounds of profits?”

To understand the ideology underlying this question you need only turn it around.

“Why should a Scottish voter believe men whose only concern is profit over an elected politician?”

As it happens my answer would be it all depend on who the businessman and who politician was and also as it happens Alex Salmond would not rank high on my list of convincing and credible politicians. However that voters should trust businessmen[1] automatically over politicians seems to me a curious assumption coming from the BBC’s most senior political reporter.  Politicians of course can be untrustworthy, merely engaged in the pursuit of power, and of course power itself, can corrupt; but a significant number of people enter politics for idealistic reasons, their motives are to make the world a better place, unlike businessman who are primarily interested in making money.
Being ‘responsible for billions of pounds worth of profits’ carries with it many concerns, such as keeping tax payments and the wage bill as low as possible, the overall welfare of the shareholders [theoretically] being the primary concern. The welfare of the Scottish people as a whole is unlikely to feature very highly, if at all, on that list. The ‘business community’ hold a very distinct agenda and this will often conflict with the interests of the wider society of which they are a part.
So when asked if I would believe the head of the tax dodging outfit Vodaphone, the head of G4S or Amazon UK over say politicians such as Jim Murphy, David Davies or Caroline Lucas, I would trust the politicians word every time.

As to the BBC its bias has nothing to do with Scottish Independence, nor is it some kind of conspiracy with the British ruling elite to cheat the Scottish electorate.[2] No it is the unconscious bias of a prevailing culture that holds that the ‘the bottom line’ trumps all. To get the flavour of this culture you need only listen to Radio 5 Live’s hideously titled ‘Wake Up To Money,’ or the first half hour of the Today Programme on Radio 4. Compare the tone and style of the interview of a leading industrialist with that of a leading trade unionist- on the rare occasion one gets interviewed this days. The former fed soft questions and allowed to make contentious statements unchallenged, the latter grilled and constantly challenged. As Robert Peston the BBC’s Economics Editor has pointed out it is an agenda increasingly dictated by the middlebrow tabloids such as the Daily Mail.  
Whether he was aware of it or not Nick Robinson was putting into words the assumptions at the heart of this culture.




[1]And it is invariably men who are ‘responsible for billions of pounds worth of investment.’
[2] As Nick Cohen points out the Yes campaign are already preparing their ‘stabbed in the back’ legend should they lose the vote. 



Follow me on Twitter @alextalbot116

Popular posts from this blog

NESRINE MALIK AND THE UNSUNG VIRTUES OF HYPOCRISY

INTERVIEW WITH TOM VAGUE

LONDON BELONGS TO ME PART ONE