REFLECTIONS ON THE TWITTERSPHERE
For my sins I have discovered Twitter. Of course I have been
superficially aware of the thing for some time but never really saw the point.
Then after a discussion with a friend in a café in Piccadilly I decided to give
it another go. The net result, [no pun intended] being that I soon became
addicted.
The appeal of Twitter is not hard to fathom, the potential
to take part in a national and sometimes international conversation and to communicate
with those whom, outside of virtual reality, you would have no possibility of
conversing and - for the politically minded like myself - the chance to add
your penny worth to the cut and thrust of political and cultural debate.
The atmosphere on Twitter is a strange combination of the
intimate and private and public and open. The conversation runs on a spectrum
from overly cutesy and saccharine to the virulent and abusive. In political
discourse in particular licence is given to a level of rudeness unusual even in
the normally acerbic dialogue of politics. This rudeness often descending into
gutter abuse and the flagrantly ad hominem. It is this aspect of Twitter that
most interests me.
Cutesy |
In the atomised and alienated world of the big cities social
media has created the means of contact and interaction that is, at least
superficially, democratic and open. At its best the cut and thrust on Twitter
is democratic and open. Where else, for example, could I express my disdain for
the current Foreign Secretary’s abject response to Israeli settlement policy on
the West Bank, directly to the Foreign
Secretary himself?
There is always however an undercurrent of anger in me, a feeling
of my own real impotence. I can stab and thrust at the things I hate and
despise but no real blood is ever drawn. So often I sit on the edge of
civilised discourse.
The psychology of this discourse is obviously deeply linked
with the strange combination of sitting in the comfort of your own
surroundings, safe from any physical come backs, whilst engaged in acerbic
exchanges with strangers. It also speaks of a deep anger running just below the
surface amongst citizens who feel disenfranchised and voiceless. For many
Twitter has become their voice.
At the very margins of this group are the socially
inadequate, the mentally unwell and the sociopathic souls who in Twitter have
found a means to enter the world from which they have been excluded. This is
the world from which the Troll has emerged.
I speak of these things in awareness of echoes in my own
psyche, indeed anyone who has ever shouted at a radio or television screen has
glimpsed the anger and impotence of the Troll.