THE RECOVERING ADDICT AS A SUPERIOR FORM OF HUMAN BEING
ON THE BRAND, BRAND
The list of things I don’t want to write about keeps on
multiplying, Russell Brand, Scottish Labour Party, UKIP, EU, The Tory party,
Ebola, Scottish Nationalism, Islamism,…the list grows. Of course all of these
things are important, some a lot more important than others. Against the
backdrop of the defence of Kobane, and let’s not forget Aleppo, most seem
trivial.
Not wanting to write about something is usually a pretty big
indicator that I eventually will. Of all the above Mr Brand is undoubtedly
the most trivial, and also the most irritating, like a wasp at a picnic he
seems intent on spoiling your day. Brand seems to believe that being someone
who has recovered from drug and alcohol addiction gives him some sort of
superior insights than other mere mortals. I have written about this before.
This kind of arrogance, usually
masquerading as humility, is far more common amongst those so recovering than
is maybe realised. This is a consequence of certain aspects of the 12-Step
philosophy, of which Brand is a strong adherent. It can be found in statements referring to non-addicts as 'civilians,' or self identification as a 'walking miracle.' Statements like "I know there is a hell for I have been there." Such statements within the confines of an NA or AA meeting are fairly innocent, if somewhat grandiose. However linger too long in this recovery euphoria and you start to see addiction itself as a form of superiority, the recovering addict as a superior form of human being.
12-Step philosophy is also where the 'Buddhist'
dimension to his revolutionary programme comes from. Brand however seems to have
turned the essential quietism of the 12 step programme on its head, seeking to
forge a recipe for ‘happy revolution.’ Of course linking revolution to play is
not new, the situationists in France did so in 1968, though far more coherently
than Brand. As for his nihilistic response to political structures nothing
Brand produces can compete with the Dada movement.
But Brand’s brand, if you’ll pardon the pun, is not just
stale and puerile it is phony and at its core dangerous, serving the
cause of reactionaries everywhere by discrediting protest and trivialising
important issues. For if young people follow this pied piper of infantile jest* he will lead them further to the wilderness of further disenfranchisement and
impotence. Conservatives like Boris Johnson love him.
Revolution on Hold During the West Ham Game |
*And I do not believe he has any real traction with young people, most are far too sensible.