LONDON LETTER EASTER 2013
This certainly feels like
one of the longest winters I can remember in a very long time; it seems to
stretch behind me like an icy wasteland from which I can barely perceive the
balmy days of last September.[1]
It is beginning to test everyone’s patience, and is certainly testing mine.
A year or so back Boris
Johnson, our calculating buffoon of a mayor warned that changes to the welfare
system threatened inner London
with ‘economic cleansing Kosovo style.’ Leaving aside the rather tasteless
reference to the Balkan wars this was not hyperbole, the Benefit cap which hits
those forced to pay the astronomically high rents in London , the Bedroom Tax and other changes in the welfare
system are driving the poor and the low paid out of central London .
I have just received a
copy of the so called Discretionary Housing Payment Claim form. This is a new
system of dealing with poverty and hardship, a finite pot of money to be
allocated purely on a discretionary basis, i.e. it is no longer part of
structured welfare provision. The first 3 Questions are:-
Why do you need to
live at this address in this particular area? Why did you move to this address?
Are there any
reasons preventing you moving to other accommodation or another area?
In my own case I have lived
in Notting Hill for 30 years and in this particular flat since 1986. As it
happens I have also worked in this borough, Kensington and Chelsea, working at
times with difficult and sometimes violent offenders. I have also managed a
drug rehabilitation project on Portobello Road . Presumably should I apply for such support all
this would stand me in good stead? That is if you want to play the rich
person’s game of divide and rule. The tone of the form is both threatening and
sinister. It smacks not only of charity, but of the worst kind of charity,
of the deserving and undeserving poor and has about it the reek of
the mentality of the workhouse and the poor law.
Went to see the Roy
Lichtenstein Exhibition at the Tate Modern on Monday and what a soul draining
experience it was. I have always been suspicious of Pop Art and this exhibition
confirmed all my worst expectations.
Vapid and Vacuous and most curious of all lacking in irony, or so chock
full of the ironic that it ceased to be irony; it also strangely reminded me of
Socialist realism, in that it had the same dispiriting affect upon me. Perhaps
it should be called Capitalist Realism since it seems to occupy a similar space
in the capitalist narrative as Socialist Realism did in the USSR . The real giveaway was in the shop afterwards,
when my friend remarked “wow they have a lot more merchandise than the last
exhibition we visited;” precisely.
Am currently reading Masha
Gessen’s ‘The man without A Face, The Unlikely Rise of Vladimir Putin.’ Coming
after Boris Berezovsky was found ‘hanged’ in his £20million mansion in Ascot , Berks, on Saturday a very timely read. There was no suicide note,
and in the current climate all such deaths raise suspicions. Berezovsky was one
of the small clique around Boris Yeltsin who engineered the mass privatisation in
The Russian Confederation and unmercifully ripped off the Russian people. He
also ironically bears more responsibility than any one else for the highly
resistible rise of Vladimir Putin. The grim reality is that as London became destination of choice for much of the
alienated and imperilled Russian elite and this exile population has
effectively imported aspects of Russia ’s criminal state into London , most ominously in the shape of Putin’s hit squads.
I thought of putting the
shortest poem ever on Dancing on thin Ice,
I’ll preview it here:-
Whenever A Russian exile dies
Vladimir Putin smiles.
It is now forty years
since Pink Floyd released Dark Side Of the Moon, their most completely realised
concept album. There are parts of Wish You Were Here that are better[2],
and The Wall has moments of very great power, but it is Dark Side that truly
endures, for it still feels as fresh and relevant as the day in which it
emerged into the record shops in its distinctive cover.
After visiting the Tate my
friend, whom I have know ever since she and I came to London in 1983, reflected
upon the progressive and radical policies of some of the organisations that we
worked for in the 1980’s and how much services have gone into retreat. Now it
is a fight just to maintain basic standards.
One of the organisations
we both worked for was Single Homeless Project, then a non hierarchical
collective. Both the level of service delivery and terms and conditions of
employment were state of the art then. The woman who played the most
significant part in dismantling the non hierarchical structure now heads up the
organisation paying her self an extremely fat salary. Service provision is now
bog standard and terms and conditions of employment much worse. I am proud to
say that I fought her all the way and resigned on the day the organisation
became a hierarchy.[3]
When I was young I thought, to coin a phrase, that things could only get
better, the idea of progress hard wired into my psyche. The sad truth about
human societies is that gains can just as easily be rolled back, that we have
to constantly defend what we have gained, constantly fight battles afresh.
I spent a good deal of my
working life in what used to be called the voluntary sector, labelled, the
sexier sounding, Third Sector under New Labour. This area of provision has now
become something of a golden goose for some. Christopher Hitchens once wrote
that you could get away with anything if you tagged reverend onto you name, the
same may be true of the term charity when tagged onto any organisation. I
intend to write more about this burgeoning charity racket at some point soon.
Written on the Blog this
February:-
‘I have often thought that
real drama can be found in the fact that in 1940 Wodehouse was captured in France by the advancing German army. His later conduct in
captivity, fooling around with his German captors and providing the
Germans with some broadcast material, caused a furore in this country during
the war. The best article about this I believe was written by George Orwell, ‘In
Defence of P G Wodehouse.’ I have often thought this material well worth
dramatising and only wish I had the talent.’
Now the BBC has produced
just such a drama. Your correspondent enjoys more power than he realises.
If you are having one have a good Easter break.
A Talbot.
[1] Indeed, did we have balmy
days last September? I can no longer
remember.
[2] And I prefer Wish You Were
Here as an Album, though it does contain the truly awful ‘Have A Cigar.’
[3] Though this latter point
sounds more principled than it actually was at the time., in reality the day
coincided with my being offered another job.
Having visited this page I would be grateful for your feedback, either tick one of the boxes below or make a comment via the comments button.