UKIP’S HIDDEN AGENDA
AFTER EASTLIEGH IT IS TIME
THAT UKIP FACED SOME SERIOUS QUESTIONING
David Cameron’s
characterisation of UKIP as being a party of fruitcakes and closet racists was
correct.[1]
Ed Miliband’s softer stance was more politically savvy;[2]
though the UKIP view of Johnny Foreigner being indistinguishable from a good
portion of the Tory right. It is also true, at one level, as one newspaper
columnist has observed that UKIP’s agenda is little more than a Victor
Meldrew ‘moan list,’ you know the
formula queue jumpers, benefit scroungers, the price of petrol, lazy workers,
foreigners taking British jobs and the
demise of British industry.[3]
UKIP has largely been given a free ride in the
media, presented constantly with an open goal of EU ineptitude.-If the EU had
hired a PR firm comprised of Mr Bean and Frank Spencer they could hardly have
made a greater hash of things. Still the rabid anti Europeanism of UKIP,
bordering at times on psychosis, hides a more sinister agenda, kept largely out
of sight for obvious reasons. A party of protest, as UKIP has now become, is an
empty vessel into which you can pour all of your legitimate anger, resentment,
gripes and prejudices. Thus we have people voting UKIP in protest at the loss
of their local library or the way a disabled son has been treated by the
benefits system. We now have the phenomenon of someone voting UKIP in protest
at spending cuts; this a party that believes that the Tories are lily livered
lefties when it comes to cutting public spending, they would go much much
further, eradicate the state from a whole range of basic service provision,
repeal all the remaining laws protecting organised and unorganised labour and
abolish the minimum wage. UKIP is a party of the far right, true it is closer
to the American tea Party movement than the BNP, but of the far right all the
same.
So for the second time in
a week I find my self criticizing the BBC. I understand why UKIP
representatives are constantly questioned on the European question, it is after
all their raison d'etre ; though I think there position is now pretty
clear, in case anybody out there is unclear, they want out. But as the party
now claims to be part of the political mainstream, a party with a whole raft of
policies, isn't it time they were grilled on these? For example, “you say the
government has not cut enough, where would you cut, have you done the maths?”
This might at least go some way to eradicate the preposterous phenomenon of
voters appalled by the current carnage being wreaked upon community services
from considering voting UKIP.
[1] Though I do not believe
that UKIP voters all fall into this category.
[2] Miliband was too mindful
of the point above.
[3] Of course some of
these concerns are legitimate, the require important questions, though whatever
the answers might be you can be pretty sure it is not UKIP.
Having visited this page I would be grateful for your feedback, either tick one of the boxes below or make a comment via the comments button.