HISTORY IS FOR THE PEOPLE


History I discovered in my teens is everything: ‘He who controls the past controls the future,’ George Orwell wrote in 1984, something ruling elites have always known. Control of the narrative being the first requisite for power; “We rule” the elite declare, “because we are destined to rule.” Should any citizen question this they need only be directed to the history books.
The government is currently undertaking a concerted drive to take control over the way the historical narrative is currently being taught in our schools.[1] History is already the worst taught subject in the public education system. On a recent edition of the popular BBC quiz show ‘Pointless’ a contestant, who claimed to be a PhD student, was unable to answer any multiple choice questions about The English Civil War. She finally ventured that the struggle was between the Royalists and the Redcoats!
Ignorance on this scale is not only alarming but speaks of a populace who literally do not know who they are or where they live and is only possible when students see history as something remote, irrelevant to their lives.
Michael Gove
To teach history correctly framed as an ongoing struggle concerned with such issues as the right to vote, equality before the law and between the sexes, struggles in which we are still engaged, suddenly the penny would drop; we are living in history. This could not have been made clearer than by the recent debates over the Thatcher legacy.
Aside from being an extraordinarily arrogant, opinionated and conceited man the Education Secretary, Michael Gove, is an astute Tory; he knows the importance of history and the importance of how it is taught. Indeed Tories and nationalists have always grasped the importance of the historical narrative. They know how dangerous is a history that emphasises the struggles of the working class, that places British history in wider world-wide contexts, exposes the problems created by British imperialism and Empire.
No, what they require to produce good citizens is an historical chronology that emphasises a hierarchy of important ‘facts,’ that illustrate ‘our great island story.’ Kings and Queens, the great and good, these are the people who shaped our world; know their place in the historical story and you learn your own.
This struggle over the narrative is itself of course profoundly historical, it is a struggle over the very heart of whom and what we are; E P Thompson, Christopher Hill, Asa Briggs, all knew this and knew that it was essential for the left to join battle.
The past is like the present, a complex struggle of competing interests and this must be explained to our children if they are to be fully aware of the nature of the world in which they are to participate. I am not here making a case for all schoolchildren to be exposed solely to a Marxist interpretation of the past;[2] but a history that conceals, sanitises or misrepresents the nature of these struggles is only a little above the level of propaganda and it is even more likely to produce students who believe that the competing factions in the civil war are a matter of indifference, only useful to know in a TV quiz show.


[2] Though I do think Marxism an important strand of thought to which young minds ought to be exposed.




Having visited this page I would be grateful for your feedback, either tick one of the boxes below or make a comment via the comments button.

Popular posts from this blog

NESRINE MALIK AND THE UNSUNG VIRTUES OF HYPOCRISY

Image
As I write this a 27 year old woman, Mariam Ibrahim, has just had a baby in a Sudanese prison, ‘the condition of the mother and baby is not known as Ibrahim's lawyer and her husband, a US citizen, had been denied access to her. Omdurman women's prison has a basic clinic, where the child is thought to have been born. Ibrahim has been shackled since being imprisoned.’ [1]   Mariam also has an 18 month old child who is also being held in prison with her. The ‘crime’ for which she is imprisoned is apostasy, for which she has received the death sentence. She has also been sentenced to 100 lashes, for the additional crime of having sex with her Christian husband. Although she has been a lifelong Christian her father was a Muslim, Sudanese sharia law forbids women to marry outside the Muslim faith, men needless to say can do as they please in these matters. Mariam Ibrahim and her husband.  Nineteen countries punish their citizens for apostasy, and in 12 of those countries...
Read more

INTERVIEW WITH TOM VAGUE

Image
Tom Vague At the top end of All Saints Road there is a refuge, an enclave in which a local Bohemian culture retains a foothold, this is the Book & kitchen , a café/bookshop with adjoining terrace. Here the bustle of the nearby market gives way to conversation, conversation in the presence of images of the recent, and not so recent, past. The past of an area that has contributed so much to the life and culture of the city. I was there to meet local historian Mr Tom Vague a man intimately familiar with so much of this history. What Tom doesn’t know about the recent history of the area probably is not worth knowing. With Tom’s energy and effort Colville Community Forum, supported by City Living Local Life, recently held a gathering at The Book and Kitchen to celebrate this rich history. February 16 6-9 Pm, with Film Screening and Readings Exhibition February 16-26 2016. Featuring 30 Classic Westway Photographs and Posters. This represents one of a number of initiatives of t...
Read more

VOLINE AND TROTSKY

Волин и Троцкого A Footnote in Russian History In April 1917 the Russian anarchist revolutionary Voline* and Leon Trotsky were both stranded in New York as the Russian revolution broke out in Petrograd , inevitably coming into contact with one another. Voline stated that he felt that the Bolsheviks, given their ruthlessness and single minded determination, would ultimately come to power. They would then begin eliminating their opponents, amongst whom of course were the anarchists; this persecution would end with the Bolsheviks shooting the anarchists “like partridges.” Trotsky was dismissive, they might have their differences but they were comrades in arms, they had different interpretations of the revolutionary process but shared the same goals. It was nonsense to speak of Bolsheviks shooting revolutionary comrades, “we are socialists, comrade Voline! So we are not your enemies….” [1] In December of 1919, whilst gravely wounded Voline was captured by the Bolshe...
Read more