I KNOW WHY THE CAGED BIRD TWEETS
There was a speech last week made by Maria Miller the Culture Secretary. In
this speech, which, though widely reported, seems now to have sunk without
trace, Ms Miller set out the governments priorities respecting the arts. This
speech was the clearest indication of not only this government’s ideological
basis but more widely that of the whole ruling elite. I qoute:-
Culture
Secretary Maria Miller has said the arts world must make the case for public
funding by focusing on its economic, not artistic, value.
She
told arts executives in a speech that they must "hammer home the value of
culture to our economy".
Ms
Miller said: "When times are tough and money is tight, our focus must be
on culture's economic impact."
But
arts organisations were told they should "demonstrate the healthy
dividends that our investment continues to pay".
Ms
Miller said British culture was "perhaps the most powerful and compelling
product we have available to us", especially after the success of last
year's Olympics and Paralympics.
"Either
way, British culture and creativity are now more in demand than ever before...
The world clearly thinks this is a commodity worth buying into," she said. [1]
There you have it in a
couple of sound-bites, the whole rationale for the arts, for the creative
spirit and imaginative life of the mind; creating a commodities worth buying
into; to describe this cretinous speech as intellectually bankrupt would be to
praise too highly.
What is truly and deeply depressing is that Ms
Miller is merely giving voice to the dismal ideology that is shaping the world we
are now all being forced to inhabit. The arts, dance, drama, music are now to
be judged solely on their ability to bring in the tourists, to attract paying
audiences.
The rot though goes deeper
still. Few now even bother to argue for education as having an intrinsic value
in its own right; it is to be seen purely through the prism of economic utility
that is on its ability to produce employable and productive people, no longer
citizens but employees of UK PLC.
The message is no longer
even subliminal: Work until you drop. It’s
a hard world out there, the Chinese, Brazilians, and Indians all are knocking
at the door. Libraries, museums, unless they can somehow be made to pa no
longer have a rationale. Indeed the whole concept of leisure itself has
suddenly become a luxury we can no longer afford. All must now strive under the
slogan:-
WORK SETS YOU FREE
Even those with disabilities need to recognise
they must become productive; and whenever we are not being productive we must
consume. Neither to produce or to consume renders one a non person, dead weight, a burden on the
state, surplus to requirements. We have become ‘human resources.’
* * * * * * * * *
Now by the time anyone has
hit 45 a rather stark truth has hit home, life, before it is anything else, is
incredibly short. Given this bald reality anyone with any sensibility must face
the unavoidable question, how is one to spend the time that is left.
Now it could be that your answer to this
question is “I want to become more of a ‘striver,’[2]
I want to spend more time at work.” Then again if you are like me you may think
not. You might like Houseman conclude:-
And since to look at things in
bloom
Fifty springs are little room,
About the woodlands I will go
To see the cherry hung with snow.[3]
Fifty springs are little room,
About the woodlands I will go
To see the cherry hung with snow.[3]
If you do so conclude be
aware that you will be engaged in a subversive act, admiring cherry blossom
being a distinctly unproductive activity. You are brought directly into
conflict with the prevailing ideology. Take one step further and begin to see
and extol the virtues of idleness and contemplation and you become an enemy of
the state.
I happen to believe that
life is too short, too precious to allow oneself to be reduced to a mere unit
of production, a human resource. A refusal to accept this agenda is what gets me
out of bed in the morning. If I can, even to the slightest degree, dent this
disgusting anti-life ideology then my days are not wholly wasted.
Though if we are to reject
this vision of a world made safe for unregulated capitalism this may involve
some sacrifice of living standards; though since these standards are already
being eroded this may not in the long term prove such a sacrifice. However a
rejection of purely material values might involve the loss of, for example,
your smartphone; you might no longer be able to tweet. Mind you isn't tweeting
the activity that caged birds engage in?
HAPPY MAY DAY
[2] I do not use the word
aspire since this is a misuse of language the dictionary definition: being be
eagerly desirous, especially for something great or of high value. The meaning
of aspiration, when applied by government spokesman when speaking of the need to inflict desire
upon the average citizen, is the exact
opposite.
Having visited this page I would be grateful for your feedback, either tick one of the boxes below or make a comment via the comments button.